Accentuate the positive, and that's what this thread is about. Reverse mergers of companies into trading shells get a bad name, when often the companies themselves are fine, just using a way to start trading quickly and efficiently.
I have had both good and bad experiences, based on company activity, not that they used a shell.
Most recently, I jumped to a little company called ETFC, only to see it bashed on another thread cause it came from a shell. Well, its been doing fine, and others of its ilk are also - followed news to averyltd.com where information on this and others bashed by A&P friends can be found.
I would be interested in others' opinions and finding other positive examples. |
