Long ago before SI turned into the democratic system that it has become today, people were banned and did not always return.
Today, howevever, SI seems to be allowing people who were banned allowed back on based on a voting system. The person who is currently being voted on is A@P.
A@P was banned for making personal attacks on people and more...
Many of his personal attacks were brought to the public's eye by Ztect. He was banned for personal attacks against A@P.
Why should Ztect be banned? A@P also made personal attacks, right? A@P made more personal attacks then Ztect too. Ztect was on topic also. Ztect brought forward many great proofs to the "A@P, Can we Trust Him" thread: (https://www.siliconinvestor.com/subject.aspx?subjectid=28802). If you bring back Tony, I think you should bring back Ztect also.
After Ztect was banned A@P said that he and Ztect resolved their issues... I just spoke to Ztect. He said that is not true at all... A@P reported him to SI and because of his status he was banned...
Take a look at Ztect's profile and see alot of great proofs that he brought against A@P:
Member 4602601
Should this man be banned?
Is his profile any worse then A@P?
Member 4899810
I am not making this thread to bash A@P, but I think that Ztect shuold be allowed to come back too.
Here is the board where you can vote whether he should be brought back.
Your vote message should contain a YES or NO vote and if you'd like a reason:
- YES - If you think Ztect deserves to be allowed back on.
- NO - If you think Ztect needs to follow TOS and A@P doesnt. |
