A new email hack reportedly reveals that Barack  Hussein Obama sold off public offices to donors. This is exactly what  the former governor of Illinois, Rod Blagojevich, is currently locked  away in prison for!
    WikiLeaks’ Guccifer 2.0: Obama Sold Off Public Offices to Donors
  On  September 13, WikiLeaks lived up to its promise of releasing more  Democratic National Committee (DNC) documents. This time they were from  hacker Guccifer 2.0, serving as a teaser for larger and likely more  embarrassing leaks from the DNC and Hillary Clinton campaign.
  Both  the Democratic Party and Clinton campaign have attempted to insulate  themselves from the content of the releases by alleging the hacks were  organized by the Russian government. The claims are a mix of paranoia  and PR/damage control, and will have enduring consequences. It may lead  to what former Secretary of Defense William Perry referred to as a drift  back into Cold War mentalities.
  The leaks include more evidence  of overt corruption within the DNC. One email dated May 18, 2016, from  Jacquelyn Lopez, an attorney with the law firm Perkins Coie, asked DNC  staff if they could set up a brief call “to go over our process for  handling donations from donors who have given us pay to play letters.”
  Included  in the leak was a list of high-profile donors from 2008 and the  ambassadorship they received in exchange for their large donation to the  DNC and Barack Obama’s Organizing For Action (OFA). Essentially, Obama  was auctioning off foreign ambassador positions and other office  positions while Hillary Clinton served as secretary of state. The  largest donor listed at contributions totaling over $3.5 million,  Matthew Barzun, served as U.S. Ambassador to Sweden from 2009 to 2011,  served as President Obama’s National Finance Chair during his 2012  reelection campaign, and now serves as U.S. Ambassador to the United  Kingdom.
  The second largest donor, Julius Genachowski, donated  just under $3.5 million to the DNC and OFA, and in exchange was  appointed chairman of the FCC by Obama in 2009.
  The third largest  donor on the list, Frank Sanchez, donated just over $3.4 million and  exchange was appointed to Undersecretary of Commerce for International  Trade by Obama in 2010.
  A 2013 article published by the Guardian  corroborates the pay-to-play scheme this list suggests. “Barack Obama  has rewarded some of his most active campaign donors with plum jobs in  foreign embassies, with the average amount raised by recent or imminent  appointees soaring to $1.8m per post, according to a Guardian analysis,”  wrote Dan Roberts. “The practice is hardly a new feature of U.S.  politics, but career diplomats in Washington are increasingly alarmed at  how it has grown. One former ambassador described it as the selling of  public office.”
  A separate release from DC Leaks, an anonymous  organization, revealed emails between former Secretary of State Colin  Powell and Democratic Party mega-donor and Powell’s business partner,  Jeffrey Leeds. In the exchange, Powell vents to Leeds over the Clinton  campaign trying to use him as a scapegoat regarding Clinton’s  controversial use of a private email server that instigated a FBI  criminal investigation. “I warned her staff three times over the past  two years not to try to connect it to me. I am not sure HRC even knew or  understood what was going on in the basement,” Powell wrote in one  email, according to The Intercept.
  Another major issue brought up  by the latest leaks is the media blackout on the content of what was  released. Politico, The New York Times, and several other news outlets  opted to report solely on the fact that there was a new leak—citing a  statement from DNC Chair Donna Brazile, who claims the DNC is the victim  of a Russian cyber-attack—without delving into the specifics of the  content.
  The recent leak teaser from WikiLeaks and Guccifer 2.0  serves to show how extensive and far back the documents obtained in the  hacks go. While no emails were released in this latest release, the  documents to come will—at the very least—shed further light as to the  extent of corruption in the Democratic Party. |