SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TobagoJack who wrote (108861)2/24/2010 12:54:45 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (2) of 116555
 
and work one's way down to tibet, but not before addressing the issue of working out the resolution for the so-called discovery of the new world :0)

So.. you're advocating for a return of Chinese Imperialism so they can play "catch up" with the US for something it did 200 years ago (when Imperialism was all the rage and even Native American tribes were conquering one another... ;0).

Doesn't matter that, since before the beginning of WWII, the US has engaged in promoting de-colonization of Western Empires and promoting democratic independence movements (though we definitely strayed from our own values at times). We even assisted China from being colonized by Imperial Japan.

The reality is that we all recognize that China is going to wind up keeping Tibet. It's not worth the trouble to liberate it so long as the Chinese government treats the people with respect and never forgets that it's not really their land, but merely a remnant of a former empire.

My bigger question is Mongolia, the Spratley Islands and, of course, Taiwan.

Will they all eventually get "re-absorbed" into the new Chinese Empire?

Because isn't that your HK/Bejing elite are really talking about isn't it, a new Chinese EMPIRE, not just another country in the global community? And use the Chinese people as the pawns in your 800 year plan?

Again.. would like to see you have the same discussion of income inequality in China, as you want to have in the US. Especially between the hired help and their employers.

In my opinion it's a major issue in BOTH countries and represents consolidation of capital into the hands of a relative few.

Hawk
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News