Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jlallen who wrote (11784)	10/30/1998 3:24:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) of 67261

I wrote, Uh huh. Starr only had 4 years on Whitewater and all the other litany that you guys recite continuously, and bimbogate was all he saw fit to report on. If there was something impeachable somewhere else, why did Starr have to embarrass himself with the purple prose masterpiece that didn't mention anything else? Has he found some new way to put the screws on Susan McDougal? Daily strip searches, full body cavity examination wasn't enough? What do you thing Walsh would have come up with if he had Starr's nerve instead of a Congressional "investigation" that immunized everybody in sight and made a hero out of Ollie North? You replied: Why? Lies, denials, faulty memories, fifth amendment invocations, witnesses fleeing the country, documents which disappear for years and then appear after the statute of limitations runs, etc................... That's why. JLA I respond: What are you talking about? What does your message have to do with the note you're responding to? I can't match your why to any of the questions.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next