| C.L. 
 Beyond facetiousness Clinton is dangerous.  Read on:
 
 What makes Clinton  tick?
 
 It is frequently stated that Clinton is a sex addict.   An addict has a craving which controls him.  Excessive  sex can never be classified as an addiction. It can, however, be understood as a compulsion.  Still, compulsive sexual behavior does not characterize Clinton.
 
 Rather,  he uses sex as a vehicle for the expression of  a critical and apparently long standing  personality trait .  In a word, Clinton needs to act dangerously, to walk the edge of a precipice and prove to himself  ( not really to the world)  that he will not fall off.   It is the demonstration to himself that he is not vulnerable, even invulnerable; that he is total master of his own fate.
 
 The  perpetuation  of   this self fantasy requires frequent  reinforcement.  Most of the time he  achieves this reinforcement by his manipulation of people around himself; by his Teflon escapes from disaster as disasters befall those  with whom he surrounds himself;  by  his frequent forays beyond the beltway to  feed off the adulation and love of  the populace.  3I feel your painý  translated is:  3Love me because I care about you.ý
 
 Clinton is a highly intelligent man but in personality and emotional development he is an adolescent. The tawdry affair with Monica is pure adolescent gush. No mature  man engages in a sexual affair by telephone,  by incomplete oral sex, and without coitus.
 There is a triviality and superficiality about this  man  who can absorb factual material readily but who  lacks any semblance of wisdom.  Solomon he is not.
 
 His inadequacy as a foreign policy  thinker, (in sharp contrast with Nixon)  is also linked with his personality deficiency.  He can be a petulant angry man when crossed  but his need to be loved cancels his capacity to  be forceful and aggressive in foreign matters when necessary.   He  develops domestic programs  to win public adulation but diminishes the country1s military capacity.  The military offers him no pay off in terms of his needs.
 
 He is known to close associates as a chameleon.  In the words of an intimate 3he is whatever you want him to beý  His apparent charm is  largely based on his conciliatory manner in all personal dealings. It is difficult or even impossible for him  to say 3noý to anyone.  This again is to please and be loved.  To not be loved  is to be vulnerable  and when he is confronted, as Donna Shalala did  at the recent Cabinet meeting,  he responds with  excessive anger. Criticism means vulnerability and this he cannot tolerate.
 
 Clinton, because of his fantasy,  cannot be an honest man.  His effort is always self-serving;  his need  for approval too burdensome and unrelenting. His  care about others and  wish  to do good  lacks balance. It is not discriminating and  objective. It is always in the service of his pressing personal need. He is  a total narcissist  and very probably without any real awareness of himself.
 
 Clinton is in serious personal danger because if, as is likely, he is forced to leave office one way or another, or if his approval ratings flag even if  he remains in office, his modus operandus will fail and he could suffer a crippling depression.
 
 More important, of course, is what he means for the country.   In our times with  increasing terrorism threatening, with North Korea blackmailing the U.S.;  with Saddam emboldened by our weakkneed response; with  his refusal to recognize the need for a more active military defense and posture in a dangerous world,  Clinton is not the man for the job. When dealing  with other nations  firmness, resistance, differences and if necessary confrontations,  are called for.   Clinton is not there. Such behavior  is contrary to his most profound  character trait.
 
 It is more than clear from reading the Starr report  that this man has been pushed around and made into a wimp by a 22 year  old empty-headed and manipulative  adolescent girl with the same level of maturity as he himself.   How can such a man deal with Saddam?
 |