I likewise question the lack of tolerance of individuals who want to "fill in the blanks." As I stated earlier, if all the answers were known already, the stock would probably be much higher, and never have dipped so low in the first place.
I still do not know where the money came from to develop the site,
what the shares cost insiders,
how the shares came into existence,
or whether the float or outstanding figures are accurate. Earlier today, someone spoke with Taylor Smith who said that none of the insider shares were restricted and could be freely traded. If that is the case, then are they part of the float or not?...
Another factor is the "missing pieces" of the press releases...
>>>PNLK, the world's largest import/export web site, and Dun & Bradstreet (D&B) announced today that ProNetLink has licensed from D&B a database containing key business information on 1.5 million companies
involved in international import/export. <<<
How much did this licensing agreement cost?
I think this company has a great concept, and I share the enthusiasm
of the board. When you look at the "big picture", this could be a little "bump in the road". On the other hand, technically, the stock did "gap" at yesterdays open, and we could retest those levels...
I don't see that anything awful was done by these "contrary" individuals.
Did anyone read over the Investor kit yet...I haven't received mine yet, even though I requested it a week ago.
TIA
Peter
|
