SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Pluvia vs. Westergaard
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Moriarty who wrote (1214)10/19/1997 7:50:00 PM
From: FTJoe   of 1267
 
<Objectivity does not involve imputing into the remarks of others the personality of the reader. When that happens it is clearly subjective.

Objectivity is simply an unbiased interpretation of information. If a psychologist were to examine a patient, then offer their opinion as to the mental state of that person based on their remarks, the diagnosis would most likely be objective. It might be subjective if there was a relationship between the two, the person reminded the psychologist of someone else, etc. You can argue that my remarks are subjective because I am in the group of folks being discussed. If I can remove myself successfully from my prejudices then I believe my comments are objective.

I believe this subject has been sucessfully beaten into the ground. If you'd like to argue and show proof that folks are being thrown off SI based solely on negative comments about a stock, I will continue the argument. That was my point.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News