Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 39.36

-0.1%

Jan 5 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (130479)	3/20/2001 2:39:56 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (3) of 186894

Ten, RE:I think it's just as remarkable to see you "flop" around in your stance once again. You'll probably flip-flop yet again once the Pentium 4 follows in the same successful footsteps as Coppermine, and the AMDroids struggle with explaining away x86-64 schedule slips." You have a selective memory. Coppermine and the i820-Rambus was the big problem with no PC133 chipset until the i815. Not to mention poor bins in the beginning. All that combined for Floppermine. I called it right, usy like I called the demise of Timna. I was one who knew that Intel would get through it when they got to the i815 etc. So I guess it sounds like I flipped-flopped. Heck, I wish I would have flipped-flopped more out of the market at 5000 too. I've been riding the fence on Willy as well, I think it's actually a lot worse chip than Coppermine but it does have Mhz and will have SDRAM and DDR. Benchs will likely suck on SDRAM but their will always be those who only see Mhz. Plus Intel can select the benchmarks. Still, the P4 leaves a pit in my stomach. Jim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next