SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 37.81-4.3%Dec 12 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elmer who wrote (132067)4/10/2001 12:27:37 PM
From: Mary Cluney  Read Replies (2) of 186894
 
Elmer, <<<Which means that Intel simply didn't consider his skill set to be as good as he considered it to be. Which makes good sense to me. >>>

You have heard that old saying, there are horses for courses ?

I just don't think Scumbria is fit for Intel or vice versa.

Intel is not known for instilling or encouraging independent thought, imagination, or creativity.

Scumbria on the other hand has an overabundance of each. So much so that I think he would have been equally if not more successful writing fiction and not necessarily confined to science<gggg>.

But, guys, let's not have any more bashing of Scumbria or Paul Engel. Both these guys have a lot of attitude. They make this a great thread.

Mary
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext