Apple Inc. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apple Inc.

AAPL 257.37

-1.1%

12:19 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: rhet0ric who wrote (13407)	5/11/1998 8:29:00 PM
From: Sam Scrutchins	Read Replies (3) of 213181

I don't know. The strange thing about it is the way they presented it. It seems like they decided that they needed to sell Mac developers on the Carbon concept, and felt that they should underplay Rhapsody. And perhaps they don't want to alert the Wintel camp that the Mac invasion is imminent. rhet0ric, I'm missing something here. If Rhapsody is becoming MacOS, then why can't the code technology that allows the Red Box to sit on top of MacOS work? Indeed, is MacOS simply a new Rhapsody relying on MAC x.x code in lieu of new Rhapsody code for the baseline system. Could not developers now write for the MacOS like Apple wanted them to right for Rhapsody, so that all MacOS-written applications would also run in the Intel arena? Just wondering? Sam

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next