| RM LOL A true trooper !!! 
 "Exposing shamish otcbb shams,frauds & pump & dumps. 4 dozen + down & havent been wrong yet."
 
 SEC BRINGS LIMIT ORDER DISPLAY MANIPULATION CASE AGAINST ROBERT MONSKI
 
 On May 3, the Commission entered a settled cease and desist order
 against Robert J. Monski, a self-employed investor living in Birmingham,
 Alabama. The order finds that between early October and mid-November
 1997, Monski placed hundreds of small buy and sell limit orders
 (typically the one-hundred share minimum necessary to trigger the
 display requirement) to affect the National Best Bid or Offer (NBBO) of
 thinly traded stocks. Monski used the change in the NBBO that resulted
 from his limit order, as required by the Limit Order Display Rule, Rule
 11Ac-4, to trigger execution of pre-existing, significantly larger "all
 or none" limit orders he had placed on the other side of the market.
 Monski intended to use small limit orders to move the NBBO quote to meet
 the execution price of larger "all or none" limit orders which were
 purposefully placed with one of the many brokers that guarantee
 execution of customer orders of 1000 to 3000 shares at the NBBO
 regardless of the size of the NBBO quote. After moving the bid or offer
 quote to the desired price, Monski immediately attempted to cancel the
 small order. In this manner, Monski manipulated the public quote to
 obtain better execution prices for hundreds of orders.
 
 The order finds that Monski's conduct, known in the industry as
 "spoofing", violated the antifraud provisions, Section 17(a) of the
 Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
 of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Without admitting or denying the
 allegations, Monski consented to the entry of an order requiring him to
 cease and desist from violating these provisions, and requiring him to
 pay disgorgement and pre-judgment interest totaling $15,000. At the
 same time, Monski consented to the entry of a final judgment in federal
 court requiring him to pay a $10,000 civil penalty. [SEC v. Robert J.
 Monski, Civ. Action No. 1:01CV00943, D.D.C.] (LR-16986); (Administrative
 Proceedings Rels. - 33-7975; 34-44250; File No. 3-10465)
 
 sec.gov
 |