to jmac and HP,
good luck to all intc owners including me. No point to discuss with you any further.
Just to let jmac know, before csco debacle i posted my view on csco (i am very long csco, still holding) to detail my concerns and worries of the fundamentals and the price movements, etc. nobody wants to listen when I tried to tell people not to buy at low 60's and high 50's.
Brad of SI (in case you dont know who he is, Brad is the founder of SI) is the only one who supports me and send me an e-mail to thank my "quality posting". Nobody on CSCO thread is willing to listen the negative side of their beloved stock. I stopped posting long before CSCO fell apart. I am not those persons have a need to prove their views, I just want to share my views with fellow share holders so we can learn how to become a better investor.
To jmac, please read my post carefully before you jump the gun : I said MO is NOT a good example - STILL, split doesn't necessary SAVE a stock - it would give it a very short term lift, but if fundamentals have some problems, or perceptions changed, effect of split is very little - it may give you a window to do something, but that is about it.
yes, i know very little about the investment world, and i am learning it every day by paying some high tuitions, such do not know to buy puts at CSCO's peak to protect my long, or short against the box, or sell deep-in-money calls, etc. etc.
I own INTC and I wish INTC will fly, unfortunately, wish doesn't worth much on the Street. The more I am wrong on INTC, the happier I am because I am long. But I will not blind myself not to see INTC's flaw just because I own INTC,
If you care to search back on INTEL thread, post 12802 from Jim Garrison, he has an objective posting on INTEL and I agree with him.
Again, Good Luck. No more sharing - |
