| Google Just Gave You the Best Reason Yet to Finally Quit Using ChromeThe browser is no longer a thing that exists for you to navigate the internet. By  Jason Aten, Tech columnist @jasonaten
 
 A  while back, Google said that it was on board with the idea that  cookies--the little pieces of software code that websites use to do all  sorts of things like keeping you logged in, and letting an advertiser  know when you've clicked on its ad and then made a purchase--were bad.  At least, the third-party kind--the ones that  track your activity across the internet. Those types of cookies would be  blocked in Chrome by 2023.
 
 Except,  because Google--like every advertising platform--uses cookies to know  what types of ads to show you, getting rid of them was complicated.  Actually, it wasn't really that complicated for Google, which doesn't  even need third-party cookies to know what you're interested in, since  it literally runs the website where billions of people just tell it what  they're looking for.
 
 Google's  real problem is that it can't just shut off third-party cookies entirely  since that would be very bad for its competition and might look like it  was leveraging the fact that not only does it control the world's  largest advertising platform, but also its most popular web browser,  Chrome. Considering the attention that regulators and lawmakers are  paying to big tech companies, that was a non-starter.
 
 So, Google said it would  introduce an alternative  known as Federated Learning of Cohorts, or FLoC. The short version is  that Chrome would track your browsing history and use it to identify you  as a part of a cohort of other users with similar interests.  Advertisers would then target ads to the "I like to buy expensive ski  outfits" cohort, or the "I just turned 50 and have two kids about to  enter college and want to re-finance my mortgage" cohort.
 
 That's not exactly how it works, but you get the basic idea. The thing is, no one likes FLoC.  Privacy experts hate it because  it's not actually more private just because the tracking and profiling  happens in your browser. Advertisers and ad-tech companies don't like  FLoC because, well, they like cookies. They'd mostly prefer Google just  leave things alone since cookies are what let them know exactly when you  click on an ad, put something in your cart, and buy it.
 
 Now, Google is introducing an  alternative it calls Topics.  The idea is that Chrome will look at your browsing activity and  identify up to five topics that it thinks you're interested in. When you  visit a website, Chrome will show it three of those topics, with the  idea that the site will then show you an ad that matches your interest.
 
 Google  says that Chrome will allow users to view the Topics they are  associated with, and give them the ability to delete them. Google isn't  asking users if they'd like to be part of Topics--it's just leveraging  the fact that it owns Chrome to force users to be a part and then giving  them a way to opt out if they want. That's great, except almost no one  is ever going to do that. Google knows that.
 
 More  important, Google is fundamentally changing the way people think about  the web browser. In theory, this ubiquitous piece of software is simply a  window that allows you to access the virtually infinite expanse of  content on the internet. Browsers competed to make the user experience  better by supporting better standards and formats, and by adding  additional utility--such as extension that allow you to block ads  altogether.
 
 For example, Safari  and Brave allow you to block third-party cookies already, and they do so  without any reservation that there should be some alternative way to  target you with ads.  Neither browser was planning to support FLoC.
 
 "At  root is Google's insistence on sharing information about people's  interests and behaviors with advertisers, trackers, and others on the  web that are hostile to privacy," Peter Snyder, who is Brave's director  of privacy,  said in a statement. "These groups have no business--and no right--to learn such sensitive information about you."
 
 Ultimately,  that change in the way Google is looking at Chrome--that it isn't a  tool that serves its users, but is a tool that serves up users to  advertisers, albeit in a slightly more privacy protective way--is a bad  sign. It's also the best reason to finally ditch it altogether.
 
 inc.com
 |