Margaret Sanger's Eugenic Legacy of Death, Disease, Depravit Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Margaret Sanger's Eugenic Legacy of Death, Disease, Depravit

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Greg or e who wrote (156)	10/12/2015 4:16:46 PM
From: MCHVE	of 1308

LOL.... of course I can discuss it... got questions or comments? <Not at all. The possibilities are very limited> Oh GOOD! Tell us about them :-) <an Intelligent Designer is the most reasonable among them> I don't think it's unreasonable at all... neither is a "creator" (same thing?). <Somehow I think you would disagree with that {my addition: intelligent designer}, if so, what alternative would you offer?> No, I don't disagree... as long as it fits in with what we observe... like the materials I've commented on... then I think it makes perfect sense... Now Brummar's comment seems to imply living things are automatons preprogrammed, so to speak... that sounds very "out there" to me, since we can observe them, including humans do all sorts of things that seem to contradict such a mechanistic view. What DOESNT make sense, IMHO, is "randomness"... kinda a dopey mental contract which basically means "lack of pattern"... which would be useless to a living thing.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next