77. By: Maytag_Repairs $$$$
Reply To: 122579 by janice456 $$$$
Wednesday, 4 Jul 2001 at 10:24 PM EDT
Post #122587 of 122651
that wasn't Marvin stupid. I understand why you guys only sue to harass,
you're all dead meat. See ya in court.
ragingbull.lycos.com
Note: another of the posts Dobry had deleted before Shell copied the whole works. Why?
Perhaps because he didn’t want to go on record as saying that dirty_bull/mobaction wasn’t Marvin?
78. By: bob_z1 $$$
Reply to: 122530 by Maytag_Repairs $$$$
Wednesday, 4 Jul 2001 at 10:24 PM EDT
Post # 122588 of 122658
Evans, the confirmation for the trace was last night. I will go to the feds with it tomorrow.
Ummmmm... Gary? You said you reported it to the feds already; not that you were *going* to.
Kinda like how you already reported it to a nonexistent police department.
To say anything different will , again, be shoved up your a*s in court
with the rest of your smear of me.
You're going to sue Janice over a make-believe call you allege was made by me?
Heck, you're not suing anyone over it because you know full well you're lying through your teeth. Both of them.
If it wasn't SI Hang-up, He won't care if I post the number, will he?
What would it accomplish to post someone's phone number?
Oh. I forgot. Same thing as posting where someone lives:
Willful endangerment and intimidation.
ragingbull.lycos.com
79. By: janice456 $$$$
Reply to: None
Wednesday, 4 Jul 2001 at 10:34 PM EDT
Post # 122595 of 122658
But Puggles. You said you'd TRACED THE CALL, you MORON.
And NOW you say you called 411? ASKING FOR WHAT???
Shell, we got three numbers from 411 that were all disconnected.
God, I can just imagine you and Marvin sitting there,
snorting stevia, getting even more delusional than usual...
ragingbull.lycos.com
80. By: bob_z1 $$$
Reply to: None
Wednesday, 4 Jul 2001 at 10:42 PM EDT
Post # 122598 of 122658
EVERYTHING that transpired with that call is documented,
from the caller ID (non published number)
to the *57 trace & Ameritech confirmation of a successful trace.
Wait a sec.
Your caller ID reported it as a non-published number, yet you maintain it was my number calling yours?
ragingbull.lycos.com
81. By: bob_z1 $$$
Reply to: None
Wednesday, 4 Jul 2001 at 10:43 PM EDT
Post # 122599 of 122658
I already did call the county dispatcher (the number you gave).
They did not receive the call you claim to have made.
Here's an idea stupid, call the dispatcher on duty last night in Cleveland.
ragingbull.lycos.com
82. By: bob_z1 $$$
Reply to: 122562 by janice456 $$$$
Wednesday, 4 Jul 2001 at 10:48 PM EDT
Post # 122600 of 122658
251 is not a valid prefix in the 816 area code.
ragingbull.lycos.com
83. By: janice456 $$$$
Reply to: 122511 by bob_z1 $$$
Wednesday, 4 Jul 2001 at 10:56 PM EDT
Post # 122602 of 122658
Has he thought beyond the intial and subsequent lies?
Has he thought about what may happen to him as a result of making all this up?
Has Marvin--now conveniently "on vacation"--thought about this?
Are they capable of rational thought at all? You've called the numbers. I've called the numbers.
We've copied the posts, we've copied the numbers. Anyone can call them.
And so prove Dobry and Marvin to be the liars they are.
What do they plan to do whan confronted in a legal forum?
Everything he's saying about it is pure BS. I would've thought that maybe he thought some
innocent who called the wrong number was actually me or someone else harassing him except
that he included very blatant lies in his reporting of it. Lies that are too easily confirmed to be lies.
ragingbull.lycos.com
garydobryonlinelies.com |
