SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Sharck Soup

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sharck who started this subject4/18/2001 3:30:49 AM
From: besttrader   of 37746
 
Inventory Mess Shows Cisco Can't Turn on a Dime

Posted By: blackthorne
Date: Tuesday, 17 April 2001, at 3:33 p.m.

> For Cisco Systems, the number $4.1 billion tells the whole sad tale. The San Jose, Calif., data networking king said Monday
it will write down an astonishing $2.5 billion worth of parts, a sum equal to the inventory the networker was carrying at the end
of last year. Worse still, in noting its expected inventory at the end of the current quarter, Cisco served notice that it has been
flying through the caution flags, adding $1.6 billion in inventory in just three months. This parts-buying rampage isn't the work of
a company in touch with a downturn shaking every player in the market. That shows that even as the company takes
significant steps toward getting a handle on its current problems, new issues -- including another inventory overhang -- could
soon arise. Cisco shares dropped 8% in after-hours trading, hitting $15.75. Growing Pains? "They set out to grow at [a] 70%
rate this year and it took extraordinary steps to cover that," says Sanford Bernstein's Paul Sagawa, who, last fall, was among
the first on Wall Street to say equipment makers were blind to the impending spending cuts. "But they put the pedal to the
metal just as the market came to a screeching halt." The biggest skid marks came from the small telcos, whose fortunes
came crashing down the hardest when the market stopped funding their cash-intensive network-building dreams. Using a term
he may soon regret, Cisco CEO John Chambers said the economy's nosedive and the equipment-spending slowdown were
like a "100-year flood." But some observers were quick to point out that Chambers may be putting the emphasis on the wrong
event. "We didn't have a 100-year flood -- we had the bounty of a 100-year harvest," says Sagawa, who rates Cisco hold and
whose firm does no underwriting. "They're acting like the unique phenomenon was this nasty down cycle and capital crisis,
when, in fact, it was the recent frothy, consequence-free sales boom." Notably, 70% of Cisco's inventory writedown was
related to the service provider business -- a failure to push gear on the cash-strapped phone and Net access companies Cisco
was hoping would open the door to the much larger telecom equipment market. Cisco's core business is routers and switches
that manage traffic between computer systems. One of Cisco's strategies was to use its healthy cash supply from its
information-technology sales to finance the sales of new gear to the start-up telcos. The plan seemed to work initially, but has
since come back to haunt the company a bit as outfits such as Winstar, ICG and Rhythms NetConnections ran low on cash or
ended up in Chapter 11.
Cisco also faces a market awash in its own nearly new gear as start-ups fold and assets get auctioned or sold directly to
some of Cisco's would-be customers. Adding to its predicament, Cisco killed its Monterey optical switch earlier this month,
ending internal efforts to push out a hot product just when some equipment buyers are looking for devices that help them
manage optical traffic. The Whispers Chambers hinted that Cisco would look to acquisitions to fuel growth. In some minds,
that comment rekindled speculation that Cisco intends to buy an optical gear maker such as Ciena, Sycamore, Corvis or
closely held Tellium. "Cisco is facing the need to fill a gap in its 'end-to-end' integrated product strategy," says CIBC World
Markets analyst Steve Kamman. The write-off of Monterey "certainly adds to the likelihood of an acquisition and would probably
imply a major buy rather than a start-up," says Kamman, who rates Cisco a
hold and whose firm has done no underwriting for Cisco. The alternative is that Cisco could focus on its strength and push
toward more data gear, with new efforts in storage tech and perhaps wireless Internet applications, say analysts. Small phone
companies and Internet service providers may continue to offer some opportunity, but the timing of Cisco's efforts to get into
telecom could hardly have been worse. Even the great fortune Cisco had with the Cerent optical box, which became a
runaway success as a metro on-ramp type Internet device, won't help the optical business meet its once lofty projections.
Cisco now expects Cerent sales to be in the $3 billion range at the end of the year, down from a previous high-end target of $7
billion. "They thoroughly cracked the emerging carrier market," says Bernstein's Sagawa. "Unfortunately, the emerging carrier
market is the one where no one has any cash." The Baby Bells are still spending, but they don't typically buy Cisco gear, he
points out. "Cisco is viewed as a data-specific equipment provider, and while they play a role, they aren't yet defining the
architecture of
next-generation networks," the analyst says.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext