2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 413.19

+1.1%

Jan 6 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Julius Wong who wrote (168153)	2/5/2021 2:41:01 PM
From: sense	of 219061

You shouldn't expect tax cuts to have any direct impacts on people who don't pay taxes... But, assuming there are no indirect benefits, which can't be tested without removing the tax cuts... would also be error. The obvious error in the logic... is the implied causality between tax cuts and the accelerated growth in income inequality... which is presented without any examination or proper consideration of what IS driving income inequality... that isn't about tax policy ? The tax policy debate... is a canard to distract you from what does matter... in other policy that drives the ongoing accelertion in income and wealth inequality... and does so deliberately.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next