JACK: Couldn't disagree with you more.
I don't have time to nit-pick through your comments, but there
are just a few things I want to point out.
I have resreached this geek, Pulver. I have read articles quoting him and have been to
his web-site, He constatly touts Vocaltec as the "standard" internet
phone system. Based on his comments in the article I got off of Westlaw a(thus, I may
not legally produce it here) and the Web page of his, it would not surprise me one
bit if he did what they claim. Believe me, you do not file a cllaim
in Federal Court if it has not merit--despite what the lay public thinks.
Second, your comment:
"I think many Internet users will see this as a vindictive use of the
judical process, to try and get at a user by putting pressure on his
Internet Service Provider, who obviously cannot be responsible for
the data sent and received by their users."
This is absolutely ridiculous. The LAW is very clear t
that the ISP is responsible for it's content. It is just
like a newspaper that publishes and is held liable for the
content in a similar manner.
I hope you take my criticism in the respectful manner in which they
are intended, but I simply disagree.
On a sidenote, I just downloaded the Digiphone TV commercial AND
a video clip demo of a digiphone conversation from
planeteer.com
CHECK THESE OUT, THEY ARE REALLY WORTH THE WAIT --!!
The comercial is VERY cool and gets your attention for sure.
The demo is spectacular, in that I was not exactly aware of how thwe
software works...it is great, your phone rings, you click the mouse on the
screen and simply begin to talk -- there is no doubt about it, this
will sell -- especially, especially, especially in the business
market where you make a lot of longdistance call,s. Eitherway, thogugh,
it was really neat.
Best regards,
Geoff |
