Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: mistermj who wrote (175243)	11/18/2005 7:48:19 PM
From: Win Smith	of 281500

W's random flacks can spin till they're in their graves, or spin into their graves, or whatever. Barone's crap isn't quite as patently ridiculous on the face of it as the Washington Times crap you posted, but I can't quite see how another of W's hacks leaking to another W suckup who claims to be a "journalist" is supposed to get Libby off the hook. There's still no justification for Libby's idiotic claim that he heard about Plame "from reporters", there's still Libby's notes indicating he heard if from Cheney. On the conventional reality front, all that Woodward's revelation shows is that the WH leak campaign was broader than previously known, and there's another unnamed leaker involved. How that's supposed to somehow come out in W's favor is obscure. You may now dig up another bloviating pundit to spin it W's way, though. I'm sure all you got to do is pop over to LindyBill's Church of W and you'll find a limitless supply of "objective" sources on the matter.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next