Again, Krugman, who argues that our politics are not yet infected by limitless corporate dollars; but rather the dollars of crank billionaires. And, he argues, that's not new.
-----------------------------------------------------------
March 30, 2012, 9:19 am
Crankocracy
Timothy Noah makes an interesting point: at least so far, the most visible effect of the Citizens United decision has been not so much a flood of corporate cash into politics as a flood of cash from billionaire cranks into politics. Rich crackpots of the world, unite!
What I would note, however, is that to a large extent we’ve been living in Noah’s crankocracy for decades. There have been limits on the ability of rich crackpots to intervene directly in elections, but not on their ability to finance think tanks, provide sinecures for deferential politicians, and so on. And the prevalence of crankocracy explains a lot about our current state of affairs.
For what the money of rich cranks does is ensure that bad ideas never go away — indeed, they can gain strength even as they fail in practice again and again. The notion that wonderful things happen if you cut taxes on the rich and terrible things happen if you raise them has a stronger hold than ever on the GOP, despite the experience of the Clinton tax hike and the Bush tax cut. Climate denialism gains force even as the planet warms. And so on.
And this isn’t just a matter of self-interest on the part of rich cranks; even they will suffer if the economy remains depressed for decades, or the planet becomes unliveable. But those are fact they’d rather not believe in, and their resources ensure that lots of people share their blinkers.
On second thought, it should be rich crackpots of the world, unite — you have nothing to lose but … everything.
krugman.blogs.nytimes.com |
