SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The ENRON Scandal

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mephisto who started this subject1/30/2002 6:29:34 PM
From: Mephisto   of 5185
 
Checkbooks and Balances

A BuzzFlash Reader Commentary

January 29, 2002

By Margie Burns

In the stampede of scandals associated with Enron, the issue of campaign finance has
fallen behind, in a cloud of dust; the topic of Bush's nominations for judgeships may fall
there too. But these topics should not be lost sight of, especially when a law-lobbying firm
that both supported George W. Bush financially and represented Enron in court is also
poised to produce a federal judge. The nominee in question is Texas Supreme Court
Justice Priscilla Owen, for the Fifth Circuit, which covers Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi
and which used to be a good court.

Notwithstanding all the publicity over trial lawyers' donations to Democrats, numbers from
the Center for Responsive Politics show that the big winner in donations from lawyers in
the 2000 election was George W. Bush. Contributions to Bush from attorneys and firms
totalled almost $6M -- $5,948,854 -- edging out even Al Gore, #2 on the list of top
recipients; Bill Bradley, 3rd; Hillary Rodham Clinton, 4th; John McCain, 5th; and somebody
named Rick Lazio, 6th.

In fact, lawyers and law firms topped the CRP list of "Top Industries" for Bush; his only
higher donor category was "retired," often a code for managers and/or attorneys who
prefer not to specify corporate affiliation.

Predictably, Houston lawyers donated copiously. Houston firm Vinson & Elkins ranks 17th
on the list of top 20 contributors over-all, with $529,263 reported so far, 68% of it to
Republicans. Vinson & Elkins also ranks 2nd in donations to Bush individually ($202,850)--
with Baker Botts (another Houston law firm, the one with which Andrews Kurth is most
closely affiliated) 9th, and Jenkens & Gilchrist 15th. Partners Joe B. Allen, Robert H.
Whilden, and Thomas P. Marinis, Jr., of Vinson & Elkins, were Bush "Pioneers" -- volunteer
fundraisers who, according to the Bush campaign, raised at least $100,000 apiece.
Members of Haynes & Boone, Bracewell & Patterson, and Jenkens & Gilchrist were also
Pioneers.

At least neither Vinson & Elkins nor Baker Botts is netting a federal judgeship. But in a quid
pro quo of Texas-sized obviousness, Bush has nominated at least six of his campaign
donors, including one from Houston, to the federal bench.

Houston's nominee, Priscilla Owen, practiced commercial litigation for seventeen years,
according to her bio, as a partner in the Houston firm of Andrews & Kurth. As is typical for
this batch of nominees, she gave $1000 to Bush individually. But the $1000 legal maximum
is just the cover charge; Andrews & Kurth also gave $4500 to Bush and $6300 to
Republicans through its PAC (0 to Democrats), and $20,000 to Bush through individuals.
That's $38,000 to Bush and the GOP, not counting other individual donations.

The firm's donations are dwarfed by those of its major clients. According to public records
in the Lexis-Nexis database, Andrews-Kurth clients in federal courts include Aetna,
Occidental Chemical Corporation, American Express, Amway, El Paso Energy, Salomon
Smith Barney and - is anyone surprised? - Enron.

Can-of-worms time. Predictably, George W. Bush was the top recipient of oil & gas
contributions in the election, with $1,889,206 in donations (Rick Lazio was 3rd; oil men
must really hate Hillary). On the CRP top 20 list of oil & gas donors, Enron was #1
($2,237,598 donated; 72% of it to Republicans), Exxon Mobile second, BP Amoco third,
and El Paso Energy was #4 ($1,116,495 donated; 83% of it to Republicans).

Since 1997, Enron has given over $2.4M in soft money, over $1.8M to Republicans; it has
given over $520,000 through its PAC, and over $100K to Bush through individuals; not
surprisingly, Enron ranks 12th on the list of top Bush contributors. Kenneth Lay, of
Houston, is also a Bush Pioneer from Enron, and just to put the icing on the cake, Enron
managers also contributed at least $300,000 to the Bush inauguration, including another
$100,000 from Kenneth and Linda Lay.

El Paso Energy has given $460,395 to the GOP in soft money, $383,755 through its PAC,
and another $90K to Bush through individuals. Salomon Smith Barney was a piker in
comparison, giving $63K to Republicans in soft money, $107K through its PAC, and $36K in
individual donations to Bush.

Anything Salomon Smith Barney didn't give, however, Amway did -- $1,138,500 to
Republicans in soft money, another $20,000 through its PAC, and at least $12,000 through
legal-max individual donations to Bush, totalling about $1.17 million. Then there's Aetna --
$315,90 to the GOP in soft money, another $50,000 through its PAC, and at least $10,000
in individual Bush donations, totalling $375,000. American Express rings up at over
$315,000; Occidental Chemical at $40,000. J. Roger Hill of Occidental Chemical is another
Bush Pioneer.

Mindboggling as it is, let's tote up some of these numbers. At a conservative (if that's the
word), bending-over-backward-to-the-point-of-neckbreaking estimate, Enron gave over
$2.4M to the GOP/Bush; Amway $1.17M; El Paso Energy $930K; Aetna $375K; American
Express $315K; Conoco $313K; and Salomon Smith Barney $206K. With the comparatively
dainty contribution from Andrews & Kurth, that's a corporate halo effect of over $6M for
Justice Owen, coming in for Bush and the GOP. This list does not include other Pioneers,
friends, deal partners, relatives and spouses.

In anybody's book, this is buying and selling a judgeship - regardless of whether the
judgeship is a reward, an inducement, or simply an enabling device.

Barring some of the oil company donations, this is par for Bush's judicial nominees. Not all
of them are six-million-dollar women (most are not women), but at least six of them are
down in the public records as contributors, along with their law firms and their firms' major
clients.

Justice Deborah L. Cook of the Ohio Supreme Court is nominated for the Sixth Circuit (KY,
MI, OH, TN). She donated $1000 to Bush and $6700 to other Republicans. (Bush relatives
have deeper ties in Ohio than in Texas). With her husband, Robert F. Linton, also a Bush
donor, Justice Cook was a longtime partner in Akron law firm Roderick, Myers & Linton,
whose clients include Ohio Edison, Provident Life & Accident, and Aetna.

Aetna is also a client of Los Angeles-based law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, in which DC
attorney Miguel A. Estrada, nominated for the federal Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit,
is a partner. Estrada donated $1000 to Bush, among other contributions; Gibson, Dunn
donated $28,000 to Bush through individuals, $5000 through its PAC, and another $11,000
to the GOP. Gibson, Dunn partner Theodore Olson is now Solicitor General (endorsed,
incidentally by the Washington Post, a former Gibson Dunn client); Mr. Olson donated
$1500 to Mr. Bush (circumventing the $1000 legal max by donating through two
"committees"), and about $23K to Republicans over-all. Mr. Justice Scalia's son Eugene, in
the same firm, gave Bush another $500, not that that was Bush's largest gift from the
Scalias. Eugene Scalia is now Solicitor of Labor, the government's top lawyer in the Labor
Department.

Other Gibson, Dunn clients include Intel Corporation and Enterprise Rent-A-Car. Intel's PAC
has donated $231,088 to the GOP since 1997, and Intel executives gave $10,000 to Bush
individually. Enterprise Rent-A-Car donated $130,000 in soft money to Republicans,
another $118,992 through its PAC, and another $22,000 to Bush through individuals;
executive Ray Wagner is also a Bush Pioneer. When Enterprise Rent-A-Car was sued in
Tampa's federal court by its employees over unpaid overtime, its attorney was (Gibson
Dunn's) Eugene Scalia.

Gibson, Dunn partners are also on the boards of directors of both 3M Corporation and
Transocean Sedco Forex, called the world's largest offshore drilling contractor. With Olson
as solicitor general, it will be interesting to see what cases get ushered into court,
concerning drilling offshore or drilling in a "harsh environment," Transocean Sedco's other
specialty.

From vetting Richard M. Nixon's finances in preparation for the famous "Checkers" speech
in 1952, to offering an LA internship last year to the "muy guapo" young George P. Bush,
the president's nephew and son of Florida Governor Jeb Bush, Gibson, Dunn has been
connected.

It's not the only hive of lawyer-lobbyists to serve as a talent pool for the first round of
judicial nominees, however. Utah law professor Michael W. McConnell, affiliated with
Mayer, Brown & Platt (his resume with the Justice Department lists him as a "Special
Consultant" for Mayer, Brown since 1989), is nominated for the Tenth Circuit (CO, KS, NM,
OK, UT, WY). McConnell also donated $1000 to Bush individually, as well as to Orrin Hatch
(and Rick Lazio). Mayer, Brown & Platt made CRP's list of top 20 law firm contributors in
2000, donating at least $478,505 in the last election, 44% to Republicans, with over
$20,000 to Bush by individuals and $61,000 to Republicans in soft money. Mayer, Brown's
clients include Dow Chemical Corporation ($241,000 to Republicans in soft money,
$150,000 through its PAC) and Novartis AG (parent to crop dusting companies; $256,180
in soft money, $120,000 through its PAC).

Another Mayer, Brown client is giant accounting firm Arthur Andersen, now famously linked
with the Enron debacle. In a particularly smarmy connection -- without even the excuse
of happening in Texas -- Arthur Andersen and Mayer Brown also signed off on the peculiar
arrangements of a Tulsa-based company called Commercial Financial Services, controlled
by Andersen and Mayer Brown. CFS filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in 1999;
the Bank of Scotland sued Andersen and Mayer, Brown among others, with allegations of
fraud, in federal court in Oklahoma. (CFS seems to have had good and sufficient reason to
go bankrupt, since its assets were accounts receivable from bad debts; this corporate
venture was signed off on by Arthur Andersen and was represented by Mayer Brown as
counsel; where are those hardnosed, rockribbed business types when we need them?)

Any case of this sort heard in Oklahoma, if it goes to the appeals court -- inevitably -- will
be heard by McConnell if he's appointed and doesn't recuse himself.

Arthur Andersen was also a Gibson, Dunn client. Speaking of bankruptcies, Gibson Dunn is
also counsel of record for a Cayman-based bankrupt wireless company with big investors
called NextWave Communications, in ongoing litigation with the FCC in federal courts.
(NextWave hit its last wave when it bid billions on airwave frequencies in a federal
auction, and then went bankrupt when unfortunately it noticed it didn't have the money
to pay for same. See hardnosed, rockribbed above.) However, the court noticed -- and
commented on -- the fact that a former partner at Gibson, Dunn is now a judge on the
appeals court there, and initially dismissed the firm rather than have the judge recuse
himself.

NextWave's counsel in this effort, by the way, was Houston-based Andrews & Kurth -
home to Justice Owen, 5th Circuit nominee. Two of the Gibson, Dunn lawyers brought on
board were Theodore Olson and Miguel A. Estrada. NextWave's investors/creditors in the
ongoing litigation are represented by, among others, Jones, Day - home to Jeffrey S.
Sutton, Bush's nominee to the 6th Circuit. Other creditors are represented by Hogan &
Hartson - home to Bush's other nominee for the DC Circuit, John G. Roberts, Jr. At stake
are billions of dollars in value in the publicly-owned airwaves; NextWave, designated in
print as a "makeshift" corporation by that notable pinko Robert Novak, has now been
awarded $5B by the courts for the licenses it was never in a position to develop.

Were you beginning to believe that this large country of ours was divided up into
hopelessly separate regions?

John G. Roberts, Jr., the Hogan & Hartson partner nominated for the DC Circuit, also
donated $1000 to Bush -- this really is starting to look like a cover charge -- with $3000
to other Republicans and $3900 to Hogan & Hartson's PAC. The PAC gave $136,000, aside
from individual donations, and $30,000 in soft money. Roberts then donated $1000 to the
Bush recount effort. Hogan & Hartson clients include Mobil Oil Corporation, 3M, and
Hartford Accident & Indemnity.

Ohio attorney Jeffrey S. Sutton, the partner in Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue nominated for
the 6th Circuit, also donated $1000 to Mr. Bush. Individual donations to Bush from Jones,
Day attorneys total over $38,000. Jones, Day clients include RJ Reynolds Tobacco,
Sherwin-Williams (think: lead paint), and Eli Lilly -- all Bush contributors, for obvious
reasons. At least Bush didn't appoint Sutton to consumer safety or the EPA.

In a recent development, the Andrews Kurth law firm has now merged with Houston law
firm Mayor, Day, Caldwell & Keeton (announced June 19, 2001; final on October 1, 2001).
The combined firm, operating under the Andrews Kurth name with 335 lawyers, will be the
seventh largest law firm in Texas, according to its statements by press release and public
contact Donna Anderson. It will also join Andrews Kurth clients with those of Mayor, Day,
including Kaiser Aluminum, KCS Energy, and Charles Hurwitz's Maxxam Corporation.

Imagine walking into a courtroom knowing, from public record, that your judge gave money
to George Bush and got his/her judgeship immediately afterward. Funny; it seems like only
yesterday that Republicans were criticizing President Clinton for "renting out the Lincoln
bedroom" -- giving VIP treatment including invitations for White House overnights in a quid
pro quo for campaign contributions. Assuming they were right, does an overnight at the
White House even begin to compare to a lifetime as federal judge?

If we're going to reform campaign finance, it only makes sense to limit benefits received by
the donor, along with limiting donations received by the candidate. Instead of always
placing the burden on the public of having to prove some perhaps-nebulous influence,
surely federal law could more easily just prohibit self-evident benefits like federal jobs or
contracts from going to campaign donors in the first place.

If donating is going to be called "free speech," then let's keep it free of White House jobs,
ambassadorships, judgeships, and cabinet positions. By all means, let's ensure that it be a
form of expression rather than payola: no federal contracts for the donor corporation, no
federal hiring from the donor law firm.

Some parts of campaign finance reform are easy: give if you wish, but -- as Seinfeld's
soup Nazi would say -- no judgeship for you.

* * *

Contributed by BuzzFlash Reader Margie Burns

Articles by Margie Burns have appeared in Legal Times, Salon.com and the Chronicle of
Higher Education among other places; she has a BA and doctorate from Rice; and she
lives in Cheverly MD.

buzzflash.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext