SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: maceng2 who wrote (22397)7/20/2008 2:57:44 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (2) of 36921
 
LOL... The question remains whether the science is solid. And that to me is amusing.

Is Monkton's analysis of the Falsification science more correct in expressing the effect of that Falsification science? That is, the effect of that AGW crowd science is at best less than 1F and not the several F cheerleaded by the dire doom AGW crowd.

G and T make a wonderful case that the AGW crowd science is Falsification science.

The APS looks real bad in the eyes of any fair minded on looker, scientist or layman. The question answered by what happens may identify who has the power at the APS, the fair minded types or the zealot types.

Intelligent types would immediately give an apology. But AGW religion is not the religion of the intelligent.

But it's funny...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News