Funny how time changes perception. That is a good plan, if it indeed is a plan, but who can know the eventual outcome and its affect on Israel?
When the old Shaw of Iran was overthrown and Ayatolla Khomeini took power, the Shiites were seen as by far much more radical and fundamental than the Sunnis. The American hostage crisis reinforced that perception. The Sunnis, (a la Saudi Arabia), were seen as more compliant, westward leaning etc.
Israel fears Iran now more than any other country, and Iran's nuclear program will surely result in war unless Iran gives up those programs. To have Iran and Iraq on friendly terms, united by their religion must be a continuing threat to Israel. Indeed, when Iran and Iraq were fighting each other, Israel prospered and felt secure. In fact Israel supported both sides, probably hoping they would kill each other to the last man. If you accept that, can you also support the argument that Israel now wants a united Iran/Iraq?
The Arabs are as disunited now as ever, and most are dominated by either US or European interests. The Sunni/Shiite problem seems to exist mostly in Iraq, and I haven't seen any evidence of a similar problem in other Arab countries. Who knows what the future will look like. The danger of Iraq breaking up into Sunni/Shiite/Kurdish parts has long been recognized, even before the war. The Americans are doing everything possible to ensure that this will not happen. And it is costing them billions, while in the meantime, Israel prospers.
I just don't believe Israel would want to have a strong united Shiite fact so close to home, especially given their fundamental opposition to Israel. |
