Ask Michael Burke Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Earlie who wrote (25072)	12/11/1997 10:40:00 PM
From: James F. Hopkins	Read Replies (1) of 132070

Hi Earlie, Well going back to a 29 style melt is not to likly, the 87 melt was plenty bad..one you don't hear much about was the 90 melt..it was bad too..percentage wise about 30%..across the board, now that could happen and it will be a bad thing if it does, cause that 30% will not harm the well to do as much as the little guy..and it will take a big chunk of the retirement money in pension funds with it, they will get hit hardest, because they are so poorly managed, and the sharks feel they are fair play. People talk about SS going broke..they don't even look at the retirement funds..the sharks have been skimming them for years, it's a bad joke..but half the money put into the retirment funds is going down a black hole, them hoping the other half will make enough to cover it up before they get caught..it's the scam of all times. Jim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next