SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 214.25-3.1%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: dougSF30 who wrote (253015)6/8/2008 8:11:35 AM
From: mas_Read Replies (2) of 275872
 
I said games were the most likely candidate, 'I suspect', and then I have clarified the reasons why. The reason I'm not 100% sure is that games are also susceptible to memory latency too, see K8 vs K7, so it's hard to tell which effect is stronger in modern games, cache or memory latency, until the rubber hits the road. Anyway if there is any benchmark where Nehalem is worse than Penryn it will be obvious and pointed out by everyone. If there is none that will be obvious too, we just have to remember this conversation when all the reviews come out is all. If there is no commercially relevant application then the Nehalem designers have done their job well because only the 256KB L2 is better in this processor, cache wise.

Message 24650647
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext