Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 180.90

+2.1%

Oct 31 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: The Reaper who wrote (26917)	9/20/2002 9:11:33 AM
From: gdichaz	Read Replies (1) of 196395

Well as LBJ used to say, let's reason together. The "analysis" is false on its face, so why? Could it be that this is a European "house"? Could it be that the US subsidiary has zero influence? If any of that is correct, why? What is to gain from trashing Qualcomm? Or more to the point, what is to lose? Qualcomm is loaded with cash. Qualcomm has no need for a "banker" and in actual fact will soon be a "banker" itself. So why not put Qualcomm down? No loss of business. Potential business from Europe which is desperate now since even a trained chimpanze sees Europe as falling down on 3G. In sum, look to who owns the "analysts", who needs money (it will not be from Qualcomm) and what is the penalty for the lies (or whatever the polite term might be) or ((cough)) - unrealized predictions of failure? Will the US gov't act? Of course not. Will the EU applaud, sure. (but quietly as with one hand clapping.) Best. Chaz

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next