What I perceive to be your idealism on this issue may be valid...
..I have never given it much thought. It always seemed to make good business sense to me.
Nor have I ever questioned how a CFO arrives at how many puts or what strikes. I merely presumed that;
¯ A company decided to enhance shareholder value thru a stock repurchase program. This, in itself, is admirable to me... in the past too many companies have gone on acquistion binges with their earnings. This may or may not enhance value downstream. A stock repurchase, on the other hand, lends validity to the theory that a company's management believes in the quality of it's earnings and has faith in it's future...at least near-term
¯ There was a rational method arrived upon to achieve this repurchase. For example, the figure of 100 million dollars was allocated to this endeavor. However that number was arrived at, I don't know. I would imagine it was a decision based on some awareness of what excess earnings would be left over after taxes, dividends, et cetera, in the coming period. These guys have to have some idea what projected earnings would be, yes?
Now, presumably, these people have some financial acumen. One would hope so. I, for one, would be concerned if Intel or who ever was run by a bunch of engineers without anyone up top that could converse intelligently with an investment banker on something other than differential equations.
Logically, then, this would not be a willy-nilly decision. "Hey Bob! The market just crashed! Let's sell some putz!!!!" It did not do Victor N. any good and, in theory at least, he knew what he was doing. (Of course, he was probably trying to play catch up on that other wise move he made in Thailand the day before)
So....here's a company that decides it's stock is undervalued at $20. It has 100 very large to go. At $20 it can buy up to 50,000 shares. How does it do it? I doubt it would send a Stanley Druckenmiller in and tell him to sit on the bid....it would also be a waste of time to the company to "time" the market so buy on the dips....
It may be that it's prudent to write 5000 puts at $20...perhaps some more at 17.5 -- then buy some stock with the proceeds plus a portion of the original nut. This is not speculation, to me, this is a plan. As long as it is a reasonably thought out plan....as long as they were committing the funds to a buyback anyway....it seems to take a lot of the guesswork out.
If IBM announced a buyback program, one does not expect IBM to enter the market the next day and "take it and bid it" until they run out of cash. On the other hand....who would want IBM to hire some rocket scientist to decide when to time the re-purchase...just so he can waste the board's time to get the okay.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Anyway, I'm too long-winded about this.... I understand that you prefer to see the monies re-invested in growth. I believe that putting some of these monies into a re-investment in company stock adds to growth. A strong stock price is very helpful for raising capital if necessary. Re-purchased shares can be used for employee incentives, for leverage in mergers or acquisitions (another form of growth),
...and if I might have to benefit from any given company's positive stock action as the result of a stock re-purchase program, by gum I'm just gonna hafta live with it, Gawd Bless America.
”¨”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~''
|* * * * * * * * * * OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO| | * * * * * * * * * :::::::::::::::::::::::::| |* * * * * * * * * * OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO| | * * * * * * * * * :::::::::::::::::::::::::| |* * * * * * * * * * OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO| | * * * * * * * * * ::::::::::::::::::::;::::| |* * * * * * * * * * OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO| |:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::| |OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO| |:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::| |OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO| |:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::| |OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO| |