SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (28183)4/28/2008 11:23:06 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) of 71588
 
Re: "I'm not necessarily against structural change in general, I just not confident that this structural change, or any other that I can think of, is the answer."

So... you have NO IDEA what would work to fix the long-term nature of this near continuous problem (that has dogged us on and off for the better part of a century, but *especially* over the recent 3 1/2 decades or so...), but you are firmly against trying the one significant structural change that the greatest number of experts believe would offer the most hope of a permanent cure, (& that has mostly achieved it's aims in many States which have implemented it in their constitutions)....

Why? what would we possibly have to lose? (Other then federal bloat, that is....)

I mean, if it doesn't work as advertised, it could always be removed (like Prohibition was).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News