SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tom Eames who wrote (287)10/3/1996 12:23:00 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio   of 12823
 
Tom,

>. xDSL needs a similar design or it won't work for long with splices especially in the humid south. There are no crossconection count rules but there are length and bridge tap rules ( a bridge tap implies a splice ). <

I absolutely agree! Great reply, BTW, as usual.

In my opinion, and despite the presence of equalizers and FEC provisions, implementation of xDSL services without making provisions for sealing current, and a rule regarding the maximum permissible number of discontinuities (cross-connects and splices), will result in poor and unsatisfactory performance and finger pointing.

Are my points on this actually rendered academic and moot, since the ADSL line, at least, will have the ability to support life line POTS services, hence, they will be wet to begin with? Or are life line attributes optional and possibly devoid of battery in the normal data operating mode?

Frank
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News