International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Robert J Mullenbach who wrote (29624)	1/6/1998 7:55:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh	of 35569

Bob, there is something to think about with the PGM's at double the historic numbers; so one may allow a figur of .10 and .16 to be added to the .05 to .08 figures for the gold as we all know that there is a Platinum and Palladium. Hope this buts a better picture together. Now, there is RISK, the extraction is being tweeked and the verifications are not talked about this quarter. For good reason, finalization must include this forcast in the future! Leaches are not complete, yet. Ask yourself why are there so many different companies doing this similar stuff, because it is the natural growth of TECH. Newtech in mining is slow. But it is progressing, awaiting news from several others any time now. That will help. Funds will again jump on. Chuca

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next