VERY OFF TOPIC
Greg,
There is no way I can respond to your post #268 (#reply-4576720). In my opinion, it appears to be the wild ramblings of a paranoid delusional who thinks the shorts are out to get HIM. Parts of it I don't understand, parts of it certainly can be understood by no one and parts of it are too childish to take seriously.
I invite everyone to click on the above link and see for themselves.
NOW, VERY ON TOPIC
Besides, we are supposed to be discussing the stock and the engine's relationship to the value of the stock. So far, many besides I have asked specific questions and pointed out glaring inconsistencies that have not been answered by you.
As the originator of this thread and the self appointed spokesman for the engine on SI, it is your job to dispel the anxiety in the minds of the potential investors when we technical analysts identify what we feel is a weakness in the concept or design execution. It is only in this way that you can achieve your goal of growing the stock price. Therefore, you must answer my questions regarding the engine, and I don't have to answer your questions about anything other than my qualifications to judge your engine. Since the rest of the thread has read my posts more carefully than you, they know my qualifications. I suggest you do the same, carefully.
In other words, take three deep breaths, two steps back and do your job.
246810 |
