OT** (THE SYMBOL WE USE WHEN THE DISCUSSION DOES NOT INVOLVE AMAT)
BK,
PLEASE, IN THE FUTURE, DO NOT POST ANY DATA THAT CAN BE DISSECTED AND/OR CONSTRUED IN MORE THAN ONE MANNER. PLEASE STICK TO POSTING DATA THAT IS 100% ACCURATE AND IRREFUTABLE.
EXAMPLES OF THE 100% PURE DATA TO WHICH I AM REFERING INCLUDE: GAAP EARNINGS, FOUNDRY CAPACITY STATISTIC, 'SPOT' SDRAM PRICING, MARKET SHARE (IN ETCH, ION IMPLANT, CVD, CMP, ETC.), WAFER THROUGHPUT, COST OF OWNERSHIP, BACKLOG, BOOKINGS, AND INDUSTRY BOOK:BILL.
THE STATISTICS OF WHICH I SPEAK ARE CLEARLY LESS CONTROVERSIAL BECAUSE OF THEIR ACCURACY. THEY ARE FAR MORE SCIENTIFIC THAN THE AMORPHOUS MUSINGS YOU SO IRRESPONSIBLY POSTED FROM THAT STANFORD COMMUNITY COLLEGE STUDY.
<VBG>
--Duker
P.S., I actually liked your original post. It is probably directionally correct at the very least ... much like EPS, B:B, Capacity Util, etc.
|
