SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Biotech Stock Picking for Charity - 2005
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Arthur Radley who wrote (288)1/5/2006 8:00:28 PM
From: scaram(o)uche  Read Replies (1) of 322
 
Cary:

"tapping into"

Looks fine to me. It's important to know that Coley and Dynavax were launched without all of that circuitry.... they had the phenom, re. CpG, but none of the underlying mechanism had been described. This is science that sounds more elegant than it's been.

:-)

I feel that evidence relating to innate IRs is stronger than that for induced (specific) responses. I've seen strong data for induced responses, but I'm not entirely comfortable believing it. Maybe PGS knows something about the newer research? If Pseudo Biologist was around, he'd have a good feel.

But applications for "innate" would command big bucks.

"next generation"

Almost pure wishing and hoping, bet on someone else.

Rick
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News