CCB vs ZEN truth board Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB vs ZEN truth board

ZEN.V 1.000

0.0%

Dec 24 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: the Chief who wrote (320)	12/13/2015 11:56:37 AM
From: NuclearCrystals	of 12350

Chief, we all know this guy is incapable of debate. The very basics of a cut-off as it relates to either a brecciated matrix or graphitic marble unit flies well over his head. Zengold wants to diminish the importance of the marble discovery but he doesn't comprehend the basics behind the high purity graphite potential within the actual marble unit. The cut-off for Albany as first touted measured against the recent disclosure of graphite recovery work on the marble unit would help explain why the marble at Miller is of such high interest but you can't get there if you don't understand the basics, let alone be able to understand the nature of exploiting the component parts of the marble unit, in their entirety. Once again Zengold, do you have any idea what the original cut-off tout for Albany was and what the rationale for it at the time was?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next