SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ampex Corp: Digital Storage
AMPX 10.56-14.8%Feb 5 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Michael Brian who wrote (338)9/24/1996 10:31:00 PM
From: jonggua   of 3256
 
It's true, Michael, that operating eps are increasing! One nice wild card, other than KM everyone is excited about, is the upcoming trial with Mitsubishi. If AXC is willing to gamble $3M on a trial, then the pot they're fighting for, and Mitsubishi is fighting against, must be pretty big. It'd be a nice shot in the stock's arm to have a nice big fat settlement. Also, other similar manufacturers usually fall in line and pony up w/o too much fuss after the first big manufacturer loses, so presumably a nice first win over Mitsu will open the royalty floodgates again. And that's even without the big "virtual disk" storage market AXC is increasingly addressing which is only going to get going stronger and stronger as hi end storage capacity needs continue exploding.
However, as to the price, if the market goes down, AXC probably will too, UNLESS there's KM news (or more realistically, rumors among the big money will do the trick just fine). We could have a major bull market in AXC even on a black monday if good KM news leaks out or is finally put in a press release. Either way, AXC is a buy from these levels, tho I don't doubt we could see Hi 6's again with any sort of broad market stumble before KM agreements get signed. General prediction from AXC's 10Q's seems to be that we'll hear something, Y/N, by end of year or early next year?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext