SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ftth who wrote (35509)9/6/2010 12:46:20 AM
From: Peter Ecclesine  Read Replies (1) of 46821
 
Hi ftth,

Please comment on the suitability of a geolocation database to protect fixed devices in the quest for perfection. Why would any radio signatures be necessary if the protected radios do not move?

>>Are you suggesting an end game (i.e. cognitive radios pervasive, across all bands) where a few hundred million mobile devices <<

Why so few mobile devices? Isn't 2.78 per person more like it?

>> each updates a database with every micro-movement of the device (and all other pertinent data associated with each operational device), every second (or so),<<

Why so much precision of mobile updates?
Every 100 meters is enough protection.

>>that data is instantaneously propagated globally to a distributed network of mirrored databases<<

With the closest database (which might be your traffic light controller, your IT department RADIUS server, your video supplier, etc.) taking its own time to propagate to distant databases - all interference is local.

>> PS the database also includes perhaps billions of fixed devices, and all types of users (government, public safety etc, not just commercial)<<

Yes. Within whatever limits imposed by Homeland Security.

I guess your next question is how to fund the databases.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext