SIBIA Neurosciences (SIBI) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : SIBIA Neurosciences (SIBI)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Pseudo Biologist who wrote (403)	6/24/1999 11:28:00 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (2) of 579

<. Only the last, kind of funny, point "SIBI is misusing its patents" falls under this pseudo ethical category.> Who knows right, but it looks to be that they are asking the court to "find" that they didn't infringe because of "SIBI misusing its patents", or at least that could be the case: <<The action was filed by PFE in anticipation of a patent-infringement suit by SIBI. PFE is seeking a declaratory judgement from the court to the effect that PFE has not infringed the patents,[**] that the patents are invalid and that SIBI is misusing its patents.>> notice the coma splice, there is no "because" [my take] and no "and" [your take] where I've inserted the **. I'll bet you a beer there's no freakin prior art, they're trying to run 'em over... what would that mean? Where are we... U.S. District court in Delaware. Hmmmm Seems to me if they expect to pull off what my take on it is they'd be going to the top right?? Who knows about that stuff? Peter? Where was SIBI's last victory won? DAK

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next