PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: sylvester80 who wrote (417510)	6/22/2003 3:08:13 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	of 769670

poor poor sylvie, all in a hissyfit. That was a good article. It is 100% consistent with my blog-a-torial. tomwatsons.homeip.net Your need as an ass in a deep deak dank hole of dunk will not see how you make PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH case with that article. LOL... But thank's posting good info and looking like an idiot all at the same time. ............. I see no clear smoking guns. I see endless facts and details. Some details support either case depending on interpretation. Some facts suggest there were WMD's and other facts suggest that there were none. There is testimony they exist and a program existed and testimony they were destroyed and did not. No direct analysis of all data will ever lead to a reasonable proof that President Bush lied. There is so much information and selecting some subset and giving it weight over some other can be used to reason that there was not conclusive proof that WMD's existed or did not exist. That is my belief about what is known and I also believe WMD's may or may not be found. Such an ambiguous state is not pleasant but it is the norm in so many instances. The talking heads will go on. Those who believe that President Bush is honest will continue to support the President and those who believe the President lied or have a vested interest in making other believe the President lied will attack with suggestions and analysis and conclusions that the President lied. Today I think I will use insider information as a measure of President Bush's honesty. And using insider information compare President Bush and President Clinton with what I believe is truth or my personal life experience filter that guides what I believe is truth. David Frum worked as a speech writer in the White House through the horrific events of 9-11 and the War in Afghanistan. Mr. Frum wrote an insider account of his time and personal contacts with President Bush. The title of that book is "The RIght Man." I've read that book and it confirmed that President Bush is exactly who I thought he was. President Bush is honesty, character, compassion civility and the strength of steel. Finding no WMD's in Iraq is a sign of honesty. It would be easy to plant evidence. When and if any additional WMD's are found my opinion will not change. President Bush knows right and wrong and his past action have demonstrated he has the virtue to what is right. To evaluate former President Clinton there is also an insider who has written about what he witnessed. Just this week I say Lt Col Buzz Patterson speaking on C-span. Lt Col Patterson was talking about his time serving as a military aide to President Clinton. The title of that book is called "Dereliction of Duty." I ordered that book, but the comments I heard from Lt Col Patterson also confirms my assessment of President Clinton. President Clinton was dishonesty, selfishness, cruelty, arrogance and the strength of an over cooked piece of spaghetti. President Clinton was alleged to be very bright and therefor also must have known what was right and wrong. President Clinton actions often showed no virtue.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next