CCB vs ZEN truth board Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB vs ZEN truth board

ZEN.V 1.120

-1.8%

2:45 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: GMPInvestor who wrote (5082)	3/15/2016 11:32:10 AM
From: Fact Czecher	of 12350

GMP's post in bold: Let us instead discuss CCBs PEA filing date with SEDAR. I have no objections to discussing my views on CCB with you, but will have to tell you I have done virtually no research on CCB. I presume they will file the PEA within the required 45 days. Do you believe otherwise? Do you foresee any problems with regulators approving the PEA with a 100% inferred resource? Do you think that is a major red flag for any investor? No, I believe it is within the guidelines for a resource to be 100% inferred at PEA level. If I am wrong, I will not be offended if you show me evidence that I am misinformed. I don't care about what your thoughts are about Zen and refuse to debate a basher. Please point out where you believe I have bashed ZEN during our exchange. I asked if you had a better understanding than me as to how something published by ZEN on their website could be accomplished as stated. No "debate" is required to respond. It appears that you refuse to debate;PERIOD. In re-reading many of your posts, you do seem to have a pattern of not responding to questions that you might not like the answer to. Instead you call the person who asked the question a basher and dismiss them. Perhaps you could point to some of your posts where you actually did DEBATE someone without calling them names and ignoring the questions posed. I don't care if you reinstated you are now on ignore. I asked a legitimate question. You think that putting me on ignore is better than trying to find an answer. Is putting me on ignore not the same as putting your head in the sand? Find another stock to bash I still think you are who I said you were. Once again, I do not believe I have "bashed ZEN during our exchange. You were congratulating SI-Ron when you thought my banishment proved I was Hoov. Now you appear to doubt that he is competent in his job. He instructed me how to re-register. He is obviously satisfied I am not Hoov.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next