SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: jaxstraw10/10/2018 11:01:38 AM
Read Replies (1) of 53574
 
In case it goes 'poof'.....and it will.....by PaperProphet elsewhere...

Posted elsewhere regarding Mr. Irons, PTOI's former head of IR which has a segment about PTOI:

"https://www.podbean.com/media/share/pb-u3tra-9b8f87#.W7aj4oaKYlw.twitter EDIT: He addresses JBII/PTOI and his own blaming of short sellers at 12:18"

Mr. Irons says he no longer blames the skeptics but sees that it's the company itself which is at fault. However he also still believes PTOI's process is revolutionary.

If you want to ask Mr. Irons any questions, he can be found at seekingalpha.com Ask him what he say--you may get some answers.

I can tell you how these scams generally work--the swindlers will pretend like they've proven the technology is economically viable and then go on for years making 'progress' as if the technology is proven to be economically viable. People will start to blame everything but never suspect that there's an issue with the technology itself. At some point it's very worthwhile to think back at the skipped steps and ask the company to show why those steps aren't being done. There's a reason why Mr. Heddle isn't talking.

Look at the IHub's message history of other scams like SSTP, FRTD, MNGA, EFTI, SPNG, etc.... You'll see similar stories, replete with trusting investors who believe most of what they are being told by the scams.

Mr. Irons made that mistake about believing most of what he heard. If he were to think back, he would realize that neither PTOI founder Mr. Bordynuik nor current CEO Mr. Heddle have ever proven that the technology was worth anything. Everyone simply skipped that step and investors were fooled into believing because of the statements resembling, "why would they ... if the process wasn't profitable??"

In fact the math proves PTOI's process is decidedly not economically viable. Look at plastic procurement costs and oil distillate prices. You simply can't make it work. If you spent ten years following PTOI..you can spend an hour looking up costs as part of your DD.

It also speaks volumes that Mr. Heddle isn't providing evidence of value. It's very clear that none of the processor runs showed any ability to be profitable. Think that through and you'll understand how bizarre Mr. Heddle's silence, and Mr. Bordynuik's silence before him, would be if there were actually any value to the process. It's an open and shut case.

By now the moderator has certainly already found an excuse to delete this post so I'll use her for a similar example. The moderator pretends like she's following the TOS but doesn't make any effort to make it clear why posts of certain posters are constantly being deleted. Is she trying to get people to follow the TOS to try to spur better conversation...or is she using her position simply to harass people who don't share her opinion while being unwilling to 'help' them follow her interpretation of IHang's TOS?? Obviously it's the latter so it's clear she's dishonest. It's the same with penny stock swindlers--look at what they're *not* doing or saying.

I'll repost this a few more times so maybe a few people will see it. Her deletions are to the longs' detriment, not to the detriment of the skeptics who don't own shares but have added sides to the story of which the longs are being deprived.

It would help you if think through what's going on at PTOI. If you still believe in PTOI, contact Mr. Irons and see if he can give you a solid reason as to why he still believes in PTOI's process. I guarantee he will be unable to give you any objective reason. Ask some former directors if and why they believe in the process and see if they can provide you with a reason to believe the process is revolutionary. You may get subjective answers because they may simply believe...but you won't get a shred of anything concrete.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext