SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Double Zero

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (538)10/21/1997 7:30:00 PM
From: Janice Shell  Read Replies (1) of 4295
 
Now, guys: let's get serious for a moment. S&L would never for an INSTANT tolerate the idea of a reverse merger into a shell, and in any case plans for a perfectly normal, though unusually remunerative, IPO are already well in hand. It is this sort of irresponsible rumor and innuendo that can give a potentially blue-chip issue a very bad reputation, so WATCH IT, okay?, or no more options.

And there will be no Reg-S deals unless the company finds itself strapped for cash sufficient to pay for "business meetings" in exotic locales. (Only top management and hangers-on like me invited, though it CAN get expensive, as we know.)

BUT, should we need to RegS*it, well, TED, you remember that really nice arms dealer we met in Malta? Okay, maybe you don't. It was EMBARRASSING to discover that you were unaware of the potential effects of six Negronis, but live and learn, for better or worse you're our CEO...

Janice
S&L
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext