SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LORAL -- Political Discussion

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dragonfly who wrote (6)5/21/1998 11:35:00 PM
From: zebraspot   of 880
 
Paula Jones has more credibility than Clinton because she has no sordid track record.

Innocent until proven guilty is a concept that predators like Clinton take advantage of in these he-said/she-said exploits. But it isn't working so well for him anymore, because it's more like he-said/she- & she- & she- & she- & she- & she-said.

We all know him pretty well now. His own staff, current and former, wouldn't go out on a limb and aggressively assert his innocence when the Monica story broke. George Steph.sure acted like an insider that knew it was probably true. Ditto Panetta. Even snake-oil Carville was too quiet for awhile.

Legally there should be a presumption of innocence, but we're not on a jury here.

You want to be idealistic? Then extend the presumption of innocence and veracity to Paula. She deserves it more.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext