SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Nanoviricides - The Other Board
NNVC 1.290+0.4%Jan 6 3:59 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: drkaz who wrote (709)5/23/2018 12:19:48 PM
From: Its_lose_not_loose of 1010
 
OK, I've reviewed my understanding of the English language and am getting back to you.

I don't think you've been honest with yourself and many of your followers.

Let's take a look at the NNVC/Theracour relationship as an example. To not admit that this isn't a way for Diwan to siphon off the funds from NNVC is just not being honest. How could Diwan take all that money out of NNVC with a clear conscious? How could any NNVC investor think this relationship is good for NNVC investors? If your argument is that it was set up that way to protect from a takeover, why doesn't Diwan stop taking the money or return it to NNVC and use the 30% clause only in the case of a takeover?

Will you dispute that the NNVC/Theracour relationship is somewhat suspect? No, of course you won't. So, in this case, you are being both dishonest AND incorrect.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News