Hi Sargeant,
I posted my preliminary response to most or maybe even all of your comments.
Stocklemon has a checkered history. They have done some good stuff in the past. I believe your mention of them created some type of hint that they were profiling the company. I don't believe they have. Probably too small for them.
To that extent, I believe your post was mentally dishonest and perhaps a rather cowardly way of raising an issue that does not exist. If I am wrong and the company is profiled, I apologize. Please post the profile or a link thereto.
With respect to TOU on RB, I believe you are wrong. They claim not to allow spam. Your repetitive bash is spam. There is no need to post the same one line stuff over and over.
Irrespective of the technical definition of spam, you should have respect for others. I have many, many stocks to cover. I try to avoid RB for reasons mentioned but occasionally go there because I hope to find info, both pro and con. You have made the RB board unreadable. I do believe on this website, your posts would be TOU violative if you decide to take on the same posting style.
You are wrong in claiming that people don't want to read info. However, just about all the points you raise are penny ante coverage of the negative aspects of a penny stock. If you focused on the real issue, your posts would be of interest to more readers. The real issue is that value of the assets if the pipeline is approved and the present value of reserves.
You waste people's time with your repetitive bash and to that extent that you do yourself a disservice. The net result is that most posters a)ignore you b)TOU you and/or c)challenge you.
I welcome negative comments and opinion. I do a ton of DD and want to see if I have missed something. However, when I come across moronic generic repetitive bashing, I tend to discount that person's posts.
I am not defending anyone else. I tend not to buy on the basis of "to the moon tomorrow posts," and, in fact, skip over them pretty quickly. Those who know me, know that I do a ton of DD.
You have now indicated that your "agenda" is some personal attack or vendetta that you have against another poster. This does not give you much credibility. |
