Sal you tell me you didn't have enough time to post that news with more detail, but you have time to post this last time consuming post.
Let us not forget about your great rumor you posted on SI not so very long ago from what you called a reliable source, and only admitted your source was wrong after it was obvious to everyone else.
As for your standards, I only made that statement after I asked where the story was, and you replied.
Scrapps, I'm doing you a favor. I don't have the details, or even time to waste in writing them. I have a lot of people to talk to. I'll write more later.
You could have said then you got it on a conference call or whatever, but you didn't.
Because it has been polluted by thousands of irrelevant, insightless, meaningless posts. And then as you people wonder what is happening to your favorite stock, you flame me for doing you a favor by posting a news headline explaining what's going on....
Just who is flaming who here? There is no reason to insult the people on this thread in order to build yourself up.
P.S. Scrapps, how the hell do you expect me to post a link to a news item, before the news is officially "out???"
Again if you had simply said how you recieved your information......ah but of course you don't have enough time. As for what I expect from you, you are right, I expected to much I guess.
And do you really think that H&Q is going to post real-time information on their site?
My thinking was the same as other's I'm sure....follow the only lead I had from your post, which was H&Q.
Anyway, if you've been watching CNBC, you'll notice that Joe Kernan said the same thing as I regarding H&Q's comments.
Had you mentioned CNBC I would have changed the channel from the flood watch. I ended up getting the information from Ying's post on the thread.
And Sal as far as fair goes.....give me a break!
Scrapps
P.S.
The sky is falling....well, it still is falling here. <g> |
