SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : SARS and Avian Flu

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Biomaven who wrote (739)5/7/2003 8:12:07 AM
From: Condor   of 4232
 
Hong Kong's SARS Death Rate Estimated
(AP News)

By EMMA ROSS 05/07/2003 06:29:43 EST

The first major study of SARS trends estimates that about 20 percent of the people hospitalized with
the disease in Hong Kong are dying from it, and that more than half of those over 60 die.

The findings are similar to earlier, cruder estimates for Hong Kong, one of the areas hardest-hit by
SARS. However, experts warn that the figures do not reflect the chances of an average person
anywhere dying from a bout of SARS once it is contracted.

The average age of the SARS patients in the study - those hospitalized in Hong Kong - is 50, and
disease experts generally agree that the virus is much more deadly in people over 60.

Nearly 200 of the more than 1,600 people believed to have the respiratory disease in Hong Kong have
died.

Led by Roy Anderson, regarded as one of the world's leading infectious disease experts, the new
research is the latest in a weekslong debate about the true death rate for SARS.

The rate has risen sharply from below 5 percent in the weeks that SARS was first spreading around the
globe.

Worldwide, the World Health Organization, which is leading the effort to stop SARS' spread, says the
death rate ranges from 6 percent to 10 percent, depending on location. The U.S. Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention puts the rate at 6.6 percent.

One WHO official noted that the death rate is lower in places where the outbreak has ended or is
nearing an end. "We know that in a real situation where the outbreak has completed itself from
beginning to end - in Hanoi, Vietnam - they had an 8 percent case fatality rate," said WHO spokesman
Dick Thompson.

And in Canada, where patients have been older, the death rate is 15 percent, he said.

"What we do see is that in people under 40 the death rate is generally lower and in people over 60 the
numbers are much higher," Thompson said.

The Lancet study, conducted by scientists at Imperial College in London, the University of Hong Kong
and the Hong Kong health authorities, estimated that the death rate could be as high as 55 percent in
people over the age of 60.

In younger people - those under 60 - the death rate could be as low as 6.8 percent, the study found.

"That's sadly still very high for a respiratory infection," said Anderson, a professor of infectious disease
epidemiology at London's Imperial College. "In other common respiratory infections it is much less than
1 percent in the vulnerable elderly."

The former head of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said quibbling over the death
rate "really doesn't matter one whit."

"It's a serious illness, whether it's 5 percent or 25 percent," said Dr. Jeffrey Koplan, now vice president
of academic health affairs at Emory University in Atlanta. "It's much higher than a cold or influenza or
most other infectious diseases that we commonly encounter."

Officials with the CDC and WHO would not comment immediately on the new research.

Calculating the death rate has been a sore point for the world's epidemiologists. Two methods
dominate among scientists: The method used by the WHO and CDC is to divide the total number of
deaths by the total number of SARS cases. The second approach involves dividing the deaths by the
total of those recovered plus those who died.

Anderson said both those methods are deeply flawed and underestimate the death rate because they
ignore the fate of people who are still ill.

His method involves sophisticated mathematical calculations to estimate how many of those who are ill
will eventually die.

He acknowledged his method still has the drawback of not knowing how many people are infected with
SARS but do not get sick enough for the infection to be noticed.

"This is the death rate based on those who have been admitted to hospital, and they tend to be the
more severe end of the cases," Anderson said.

The Lancet study, based on 1,425 SARS cases in Hong Kong up to April 28, also found that the
maximum incubation period - the time it takes between getting infected and becoming ill - may be as
long as 14 days.

Quarantine measures have been based on a maximum incubation period of 10 days.

If the incubation period is truly longer than 10 days, people who are being quarantined because they
have been in close contact with a SARS patient may not be in isolation long enough.

"The article does raise the caution that maybe we need to move the curve out a little bit by four days
and that's well worth further study," Koplan said.

WHO said it is possible that the incubation period could be longer than 10 days because the U.N.
agency calculates it starting from the last day a person was exposed to SARS.

___

On the Net:

World Health Organization: who.int

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention:http://www.who.int/csr/sars/en/

cdc.gov
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext