THE WHITE HOUSE Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE

SPY 689.52

-0.3%

Jan 7 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Gersh Avery who wrote (7683)	8/23/2007 8:29:43 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) of 25737

First I've heard of that. But, such a position would be ENTIRELY CONSISTENT with how I read the US Constitution with respect to the rights of STATES, and the limitations on federal power. After all... when there is no 'inter-state commerce' from these State licensed facilities, then there should be NO federal presence at all. THAT would be the Libertarian perspective... THAT would be true small-government Conservatism. (Of course, all the Big Government Authoritarians howl every time someone points out that the Constitution does not give them carte blanche to run people's private lives, or to order individuals and the States themselves, to live exactly the way Big Brother prefers....)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next