Dream Machine ( Build your own PC ) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Dream Machine ( Build your own PC )

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Spots who wrote (7726)	6/2/1999 12:48:00 AM
From: mowa	of 14778

Dave, All under NT. I was on a quest for decent fax software and ended up with WinFax. I tried HotFax, BitWare, several lesser knowns. I found comm-port handling clumsy on all but WinFax 8 (although BitWare was a Beta of 4.0?). Most features of 8.0 worked as advertised, and I recently shelled out for 9.0 (8.0 was trial-ware). Not a whole lot of difference in the core features except for one feature I was looking for, better archiving of address books/segregation of data. Of course the continued 98/glosification of the UI. I can recommend it. As for the resource requirements, well I have long considered Symantec to be second only to Big M in gobbling up mem. Luckily for me an underpowered box is a 350/128 :) mowa

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next