SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bear Down who wrote (8080)4/17/2005 9:14:25 PM
From: olivier asser   of 12465
 
to me it sounds like i should assume someone paid you to keep the truth from comming out. Who paid you Ollie? how much? Is that your game? sounds almost like extortion, blackmail or somethin illegal

Since it's rapidly becoming clear that Berber and Moor have no respect for our judicial system, they through counsel have no problems bringing a large number of totally and completely frivolous, not to mention sanctionable, arguments, and now are apparently resorting to desperate tactics, let's review the criminal code as to blackmail and extortion:

BLACKMAIL

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 41

§ 873. Blackmail

Whoever, under a threat of informing, or as a consideration for not informing, against any violation of any law of the United States, demands or receives any money or other valuable thing, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.


EXTORTION

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 41

§ 875. Interstate communications

(d) Whoever, with intent to extort from any person, firm, association, or corporation, any money or other thing of value, transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication containing any threat to injure the property or reputation of the addressee or of another or the reputation of a deceased person or any threat to accuse the addressee or any other person of a crime, shall be fined under this title or impisoned not more than two years, or both.


There is a slight, wee little problem with this latest cretinous defense tactic: I have not threatened any defendants with damage to their reputation, nor have I threatened them with reporting their crimes in order to receive compensation. You see, for my statements to be a threat, then by definition I would not have been able to already have carried out what I said - and I have carried out my intentions for years here in public, as the record makes quite clear. In fact I have publicly accused Berber and Mooor of serious crimes for years, here and through the media, with the purpose of hopefully ensuring that the public would be well-armed and informed of what the defendants did. I have not hidden these allegations; I have not kept quiet; I in fact have had an exceedingly big mouth, as my several thousand posts here and speaking with reporters will confirm. So, if there was damage to be rightfully done well then I hope I already did some, but that's not nearly enough to compensate me or anyone else for the numerous crimes that have been committed with self-arrogated impunity.

So, my dear litigation adversaries Berber and Moor:

(a) I have not ever agreed to stop informing anyone about your myriad crimes, in fact I filed them publicly in numerous courts;

(b) I have not threatened to injure or damage your reputations or threatened to accuse you of crimes for any benefit; in fact I have for years I hope brought out the truth about you and your crimes, so that others might know what really happened as a public service in order to avoid further destruction and damages by like-minded criminals ; and

(c) Due to your ongoing racketeering violations, before and now attempting to via interstate wire defraud me of my rightful day in court, and justice in the form of damages adequate to your crimes awarded by a jury of our peers in a court of law, your ongoing defamation of my character and reputation, your clear attempts to destroy me as you destroyed so many thousands of others, you can forever forget any confidentiality clauses, unless they are ordered and imposed upon me by order of a federal court - and if they are, it's more than likely that I will contest those particular provisions as unconscionable, all things considered, I am the last person who would agree that your crimes should be hidden from public view, inspection and judgment.

I warned you for years: Assers and Thorbeckes do not threaten; we stand up in public and state the truth - and then we take action. I am no exception.

Cretins all. Let's see if Berber and Moor, with all of their gigantic advantages and privilege, all ill-gotten, don't find this particular truth-typhoon swamping them and completely, when the jury decides, publicly.

By the way, under the above statutes, I could bring criminal charges against a large number of parties, who attempted and conspired to attempt to extort tax payments from me of almost $2 million unless I ceased and desisted from this litigation.

Do my adversaries truly want to head down this road is an interesting question. Do they want to broaden this scandal any more? Maybe. We'll see.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext